Page:Illustrations of the history of medieval thought and learning.djvu/242

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

CHAPTER IX.

THE OPPOSITION TO THE TEMPORAL CLAIMS OF THE PAPACY.

The eclipse of the empire in the latter part of the thirteenth century furnished an opportunity, of which we cannot wonder that the popes availed themselves, for augmenting and extending their political pretensions. Now however they were involved in a more difficult struggle, since an unsuspected obstacle had arisen in the growing national spirit of England and France. It is principally these changed conditions that make the pontificate of Boniface the Eighth a turning-point in the history of the medieval papacy; and it is an interesting study to watch the interworkings of the new motives in political speculation, now that the oppressive weight of the imperial conception was for the time removed.[1] One of the most curious essays in this regard is a treatise written in the latter part of the year 1300 by a certain royal advocate in Normandy, a person whom we may confidently identify with Peter du Bois, who held that office in the bailliage of Coutances, and is elsewhere known as a hot partisan of Philip the Fair in his contest with Boniface.[2] The professed aim of this treatise is

  1. In collecting materials for the present chapter I have derived very great assistance from the able work of Dr. Riezler on Die literarischen Widersacher der Päpste zur Zeit Ludwig des Baiers. I may notice that what I refer to as the second volume of Goldast's Monarchias, Romani Imperii, 1614, appears as the third volume in the reïssue of that work, in which only the title-page and table of contents are new, dated 1621.
  2. See Natalis de Wailly, Mémoire sur un Opuscule anonyme intitulé Summaria brevis et compendiosa Doctrina felicis Expeditionis et Abbreviationis Guerrarum ac Litium Regni Francorum, in the Mémoires de l'Académie des Inscriptions et des Belles-lettres 18 (2) 435-494; 1849. M. de Wailly is able to fix the date minutely, pp. 471-476, and discourses with much acuteness and ingenuity about the author and his other works, pp. 481-493. [See also M. C. V. Langlois' introduction to du Bois' tract De recuperatione terre sancte, 1891.]

224