Page:Introduction to the Assyrian church.djvu/186

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
180
HISTORY OF THE ASSYRIAN CHURCH

The election of Elisha was contested, and a somewhat lengthy dispute resulted. Finally the candidate, seeing that it was impossible to secure any unanimous choice, procured an irregular consecration from his own supporters (of whom the Bishop of Merv was chief), probably in the hope that his opponents would be obliged to accept a fait accompli.[1] This, however, they would not do; and after a fruitless appeal to Kobad, chose and consecrated one Narses. This claimant was a man of Huzistan, with some reputation for learning. He had, however, few supporters; and his own diocesan appears to have been none too willing to accept him. Ultimately, however, the latter withdrew his opposition, apparently on the ground that Elisha was too impossible, and the consecration was performed. Elisha, however, would not give way, and each claimant began consecrating bishops in the sees of those who refused to recognize him. A destructive schism followed—almost every diocese and province being divided against itself, and spiritual life and power naturally suffering.

Narses ultimately died; and Elisha hoped for the moment that his claim would now be acknowledged. But though all longed for peace, all were disgusted with him and his conduct, and not a man would accept him.

A synod of some kind was gathered, and the pseudo-patriarch formally deposed. It was declared


    scend, by what is known as the "Natar-cursya system," from uncle to nephew. The custom, of course, is uncanonical, and as completely opposed to primitive usage as is nomination by a lay rrime Minister, or by an universal Pope!

    The first two habits at any rate can only be defended on the ground that they are the outcome of historical conditions, and in practice produce results that are not intolerable.

  1. Liber Turris.