Page:John Banks Wilson - Maneuver and Firepower (1998).djvu/108

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
86
MANEUVER AND FIREPOWER

Superior Board members. Left to right, Maj. Gens. Joseph T. Dickman, John L. Hines, and William Lassiter, Col. George R. Spalding, Brig. Gen. William Burtt, and Col. Parker Hitt.

and a machine gun squadron, an artillery regiment, and auxiliary units. The board rejected the three-regiment unit because it eliminated a general officer billet, recommending instead a square cavalry division of some 13,500 men.

The Superior Board completed its work on 1 July 1919, but Pershing held the report to consider its findings. He did not forward it to the War Department until almost a year later.[1]

Development of Divisions Under the 1920 National Defense Act

Although Pershing temporarily shelved the Superior Board Report, Congress and the War Department proceeded to explore postwar Army organization. On 3 August 1919, Secretary Baker proposed a standing army of approximately 500,000 men and universal military training for eighteen- and nineteen-year-old males. With that number the department envisaged maintaining one cavalry and twenty infantry divisions. March testified that before 1917, when the Army was stationed at small, scattered posts, officers had no occasion to command brigades or divisions or gain experience in managing large troop concentrations. Under the proposed reorganization, officers would have the opportunity to command large units and to train combined arms units, thus correcting a major weakness of past mobilizations.[2]

  1. Wrapper Indorsement (Forwarding Report of the AEF Superior Board), 16 Jun 20. Although Pershing held the report, its recommendations were widely known by the Army Staff.
  2. John Dickinson, The Building of an Army (New York: Century Co., 1922), pp. 330–34.