Page:Lenox v. Notrebe, Hempst. 251 (Super. Ct. Ark. Terr. 1834).pdf/1

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
TERRITORY OF ARKANSAS.
251

Lenox v. Notrebe et al. and Hamiltons v. Notrebe et al.

John H. Lenox, surviving administrator of William Lenox, deceased, complainant, vs. Frederick Notrebe and others, defendants on original bill; and Mary Ann Hamilton and Margaret Hamilton by guardian, complainants, vs. Frederick Notrebe and others, defendants on cross-bill.

  1. In the absence of fraud or mistake, distinctly alleged and clearly proved, a court of equity will not set aside a deed regularly executed.
  2. A deed, or judgment, or decree, of twenty years standing, may be set aside for fraud; but the fraud must be clearly alleged, and satisfactorily proved, either by positive or circumstantial testimony.
  3. An equity is not subject to execution, unless by statute.
  4. A trustee cannot become the purchaser of the estate or property of which he is trustee; nor can he buy an outstanding claim or title for his own benefit, and it will enure to the benefit of the cestui que trust.
  5. A fraudulent conveyance is good as between the grantor and grantee, and their heirs and representatives, but is void as to creditors and purchasers.
  6. Infants cannot be prejudiced by misstatements or omissions of their guardian in his answer, and equity will decree according to the facts of the case.
  7. The answer of one defendant is not evidence for or against a codefendant.
  8. An answer responsive to the bill, is evidence against the complainant.
  9. A widow is not dowable of a trust estate.
  10. A promise by a purchaser after a sheriff's sale to reconvey property purchased by him, is without consideration, and he cannot be required to perform the agreement.
  11. Persons not parties or privies to a judgment are not bound by it.

July, 1834.—Bills in Chancery, determined before Benjamin Johnson, Edward Cross, and Thomas J. Lacy, judges.

LACY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.—The complainants filed their original bill to set aside and cancel a mortgage which they allege was executed by James Hamilton in his lifetime to Frederick Notrebe, and also to set aside and cancel a deed of sale made by said Notrebe to the legal representatives of said Hamilton; they pray all the title and interest of the property contained in said deed be vested in themselves. The bill states that Hamilton became indebted to Notrebe in the sum of about $500, for which he executed a mortgage on two slaves, Phillis and Caroline, which they have fully satisfied. It charges that all the property belonging to Hamilton was ex-