tive reactions. Of these the positive is masked by the
predominant negative. v
So much for theory; is it possible to unmask the contained positive in the resulting negative reSponse under Direct stimulus? This important aspeCt of the subject will be dealt with in the following Paper.
SUMMARY.
The application of Direct stimulus gives rise to an electric response of galvanometric negativity. The applica- tion of stimulus at a distance from the responding point, 17.19.. Indirect stimulus, gives rise to positive electric response.
The mechanical reSponses of sensitive plants also exhi- hit similar effects, 17.9., a negative response under Direct, and positive response under Indirect stimulus.
In the responsive variation of growth, Direct stimulus induces a retardation, and Indirect stimulus an acceleration of the rate of growth.
The effects of Direct. and Indirect stimulus on vege- table. organs in general are as follows:
Direct. stimulus induces negative variation of turgor, contraction, fall of leaf of Mimosa, electric change of galvanometric negativity, and retartlw tion of the etc of growth.
Indirect stimulus induces positive variation of turgor. expansion, erection of leaf of Mimosa, electrical change of galvanometric positivity and accelera- tion of the rate of growth.
