This page has been validated.
Love's Labour's Lost
135
well as upon style. In the recent Cambridge edition Mr. Dover Wilson has made a similar attempt,[1] independently and by means of totally different criteria—chiefly the bibliographical phenomena of the Quarto and Folio texts. The various results are of course contradictory in many details, but the investigators all agree in assigning a large preponderance of the first three acts to the original version and the larger part of the last two to the revision.
- ↑ The results are summarized on p. 116, of the Cambridge edition.
