gin to produce those difficulties that seem in his opinion, to thwart this new disposition of the World.
Simpl.That disposition is not new, but very old; and that you may see it is so, Aristotle confuteth it; and his confutations are these:Aristotles Arguments for the Earths quiessence. "First if the Earth moveth either in it self about its own Centre, or in an Excentrick Circle, it is necessary that that same motion be violent; for it is not its natural motion, for if it were, each of its parts would partake thereof; but each of them moveth in a right line towards its Centre. It being therefore violent and pteternatural, it could never be perpetual: But the order of the World is perpetual. Therefore, &c. Secondly, all the other moveables that move circularly, seem to* Restino indietzo, which is meant here of that motion which a bowl makes when its born by its byas to one side or other, and so hindered in its direct motion. * stay behind, and to move with more than one motion, the Primum Mobile excepted: Whence it would be necessary that the Earth also do move with two motions; and if that should be so, it would inevitably follow, that mutations should be made in the Fixed Stars, the which none do perceive; nay without any variation, the same Stars alwayes rise from towards the same places, and in the same places do set. Thirdly, the motion of the parts is the same with that of the whole, and naturally tendeth towards the Centre of the Universe; and for the same cause rest, being arrived thither. He thereupon moves the question whether the motion of the parts hath a tendency to centre of the Universe, or to the centre of the Earth; and concludeth that it goeth by proper instinct to the centre of the Universe, and per accidence to that of the Earth; of which point we largely discoursed yesterday. He lastly confirmeth the same with a fourth argument taken from the experiment of grave bodies, which faling from on high, descend perpendicularly unto the Earths surface; and in the same manner Projections shot perpendicularly upwards, do by the same lines return perpendicularly down again, though they were shot to a very great height. All which arguments necessarily prove their motion to be towards the Centre of the Earth, which without moving at all waits for, and receiveth them. He intimateth in the last place that the Astronomers alledg other reasons in confirmation of the same conclusions, I mean of the Earths being in the Centre of the Universe, and immoveable; and instanceth onely in one of them, to wit, that all the Phænomena or appearances that are seen in the motions of the Stars, perfectly agree with the position of the Earth in the Centre; which would not be so, were the Earth seated otherwise. The rest produced by Ptolomy and the other Astronomers, I can give you now if you please, or after you have spoken what you have to say in answer to these of Aristotle."
Salv.The arguments which are brought upon this occasionare
