mum mobile) therefore the Earth moving about its own centre, being placed in the middle, must of necessity have two byasses, and foreslow. But if this were so, it would follow, that there should be a variation in the rising and setting of the fixed Stars, which we do not perceive to be done: Therefore the Earth doth not move, &c. Here is the Paralogisme, and to discover it, I will argue with Aristotle in this manner. Thou saist, oh Aristotle, that the Earth placed in the middle of the World, cannot move in it self (i. e. upon its own axis) for then it would be requisite to allow it two byasses; so that, if it should not be necessary to allow it more than one Byas onely, thou wouldest not then hold it impossible for it to move onely with that one; for thou would'st unnecessarily have confined the impossibility to the plurality of byasses, if in case it had no more but one, yet it could not move with that. And because that of all the moveables in the World, thou makest but one alone to move with one sole byas; and all the rest with more than one; and this same moveable thou affirmest to be the first Sphere, namely, that by which all the fixed and erratick Stars seem harmoniously to move from East to West, if in case the Earth may be that first Sphere, that by moving with one byas onely, may make the Stars appear to move from East to West, thou wilt not deny them it: But he that affirmeth, that the Earth being placed in the midst of the World, moveth about its own Axis, ascribes unto it no other motion, save that by which all the Stars appear to move from East to West; and so it cometh to be that first Sphere, which thou thy self acknowledgest to move with but one byas onely. It is therefore necessary, oh Aristotle, if thou wilt conclude any thing, that thou demonstrate, that the Earth being placed in the midst of the World, cannot move with so much as one byas onely; or else, that much lesse can the first Sphere have one sole motion; for otherwise thou doest in thy very Sillogisme both commit the falacy, and detect it, denying, and at that very time proving the same thing. I come now to the second Position, namely, of those who placing the Earth far from the midst of the Universe, make it moveable about the same; that is, make it a Planet and erratick Star; against which the argument is directed, and as to form is concludent, but faileth in matter. For it being granted, that the Earth doth in that manner move, and that with two byasses, yet doth it not necessarily follow that though it were so, it should make alterations in the risings and settings of the fixed Stars, as I shall in its proper place declare. And here I could gladly excuse Aristotle; rather I could highly applaud him for having light upon the most subtil argument that could be produced against the Copernican Hypothesis; and if the objection be inge-nious,
