tion, may be by us observed in the fixed stars to be of two kinds: The one is, that of their apparent magnitudes varied, according as we, transported by the Earth, approach or recede from the same: The other (which likewise dependeth on the same accession and recession) their appearing unto us in the same Meridian, one while more elevated, and another while lesse. Moreover, you tell us (and I understand it very well) that the one and other of these mutations are not made alike in all the stars, but in some greater, and in others lesser, and in others not at all. The accession and recession whereby the same star ought to appear, one while bigger, and another while lesser, is insensible, and almost nothing in the stars neer unto the pole of the Ecliptick, but is greatest in the stars placed in the Ecliptick it self, and indifferent in the intermediate: the contrary happens in the other difference, that is, the elevation or depression of the stars placed in the Ecliptick is nothing at all, greatest in those neerest to the Pole of the said Ecliptick, and indifferent in the intermediate. Besides, both these differences are more sensible in the Stars neerest to us, in the more remote lesse sensible, and in those that are very far distant wholly disappear. This is, as to what concerns my self; it remaineth now, as I conceive, that something be said for the satisfaction of Simplicius, who, as I believe, will not easily be made to over-passe those differences, as insensible that are derived from a motion of the Earth so vast, and from a mutation that transports the Earth into places twice as far distant from us as the Sun.
Simpl.Truth is, to speak freely, I am very loth to confesse, that the distance of the fixed Stars ought to be such, that in them the fore-mentioned differences should be wholly imperceptible.
Salv.Do not throw your self into absolute despair, Simplicius, for there may perhaps yet some qualification be found for your difficulties. And first, that the apparent magnitude of the stars is not seen to make any sensible alteration, ought not to be judged by you a thing improbable, in regard you see the guesses of men in this particular to be so grossely erroneous, especially in looking upon splendid objects; and you your self beholding v. g. a lighted Torch at the distance of 200 paces,In objects far remote, and luminous, a small approach or recession is imperceptible. if it approach nearer to you 3. or 4. yards, do you think that it will shew any whit encreased in magnitude? I for my part should not perceive it certainly, although it should approach 20. or 30. yards nearer; nay it hath sometimes happened that in seeing such a light at that distance I know not how to resolve whether it came towards me, or retreated from me, when as it did in reality approach nearer to me. But what need I speak of this? If the self same accession and recession (I speak of a distancetwice
