true sense of the word, until irrefutable proofs of the possession of these powers are produced.
In attempting to inquire how far the results obtained by Spiritual Healing justify the movement, the medical man is met by the difficulty that exists in obtaining evidence. It is true that there is a Society whose objects are stated thus:
1. For the cultivation, through spiritual means, of both personal and corporate health.
2. For the restoration to the Church of the Scriptural practice of Divine Healing.
3. For the study of the influence of Spiritual upon Physical well-being.
Investigation of the literature published by this Society does not throw much light on the methods by which these objects are pursued. A pamphlet entitled 'The Principles of Spiritual Healing' seemed to arouse hopes of elucidating the problem. Yet the author says, 'I do not know how "life" is affected by spiritual means, I observe that it is so.' There is no attempt to define spiritual means. Again, it is asserted that no one will ever find, at meetings of the Society, a parade of successful cases. Is the statement, then, of members of the Society to be the only evidence vouchsafed to inquirers? And how far is the second object of the Society to be carried? It must
