Jump to content

Page:Mexico, Aztec, Spanish and Republican, Vol 1.djvu/325

From Wikisource
This page has been validated.

CHAPTER V.

1824—1829.


REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF MEXICO AND THE FORMATION OF PARTIES. — VICEROYAL GOVERNMENT — THE PEOPLE — THE ARMY — THE CHURCH. — CONSTITUTION OF 1824. — ECHAVARI REVOLTS. — VICTORIA PRESIDENT — ESCOCESSES — YORKINOS — REVOLTS CONTINUED. — MONTAYNO — GUERRERO. — GOMEZ PEDRAZA PRESIDENT — IS OVERTHROWN. — FEDERALISTS — CENTRALISTS — GUERRERO PRESIDENT. — ABOLITION OF SLAVERY IN MEXICO.

We must pause a moment over the past history of Mexico, for the portion we now approach has few of the elements either of union or patriotism which characterized the early struggles for national independence. The revolutionary war had merited and received the commendation of freemen throughout the world. The prolonged struggle exhibited powers of endurance, an unceasing resolution, and a determination to throw off European thraldom, which won the respect of those northern powers on this continent who were most concerned in securing to themselves a republican neighborhood. But, as soon as the dominion of Spain was crushed, the domestic quarrels of Mexico began, and we have already shown that in the three parties formed in the first congress, were to be found the germs of all the feuds that have since vexed the republic or impeded its successful progress towards national grandeur. After the country had been so long a battle field, it was perhaps difficult immediately to accustom the people to civil rule or to free them from the baleful influence which military glory is apt to throw round individuals who render important services to their country in war. Even in our own union, where the ballot box instead of the bayonet has always controled elections, and where loyalty to the constitution would blast the effort of ambitious men to place a conqueror in power by any other means than that of peaceful election, we constantly find how difficult it is to screen the people's eyes from the bewildering glare of military glory. What then could we expect from a country in which the self-relying, self-ruling, civil idea never existed at any period of its previous history? The revolution of the North American colonies