Why do you charge for teaching Christian Science, when all the good we can do must be done freely?
When teaching imparts the ability to gain and maintain health, to heal and elevate man in every line of life, — as this teaching certainly does, — is it unreasonable to expect in return something to support one's self and a Cause? If so, our whole system of education, secular and religious, is at fault, and the instructors and philanthropists in our land should expect no compensation. “If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?”
How happened you to establish a college to instruct in metaphysics, when other institutions find little interest in such a dry and abstract subject?
Metaphysics, as taught by me at the Massachusetts Metaphysical College, is far from dry and abstract. It is a Science that has the animus of Truth. Its practical application to benefit the race, heal the sick, enlighten and reform the sinner, makes divine metaphysics needful, indispensable. Teaching metaphysics at other colleges means, mainly, elaborating a man-made theory, or some speculative view too vapory and hypothetical for questions of practical import.
Is it necessary to study your Science in order to be healed by it and keep well?
It is not necessary to make each patient a student in order to cure his present disease, if this is what you mean. Were it so, the Science would be of less
