a state and an empire out of the Arab tribes. I have endeavoured, in recounting the mode in which he accomplished this, to do justice to his intellectual ability and to observe towards him the respectful attitude which his greatness deserves; but otherwise this book does not aim at being either an apology or an indictment. Indeed neither sort of work is now required. The charming and eloquent treatise of Syed Ameer Ali[1] is probably the best achievement in the way of an apology for Mohammed that is ever likely to be composed in a European language whereas indictments are very numerous—some dignified and moderate, as is the work of Sir William Muir; others fanatical and virulent.[2] These works are ordinarily designed to show the superiority or inferiority of Mohammed's religion to some other system; an endeavour from which it is hoped that this book will be found to be absolutely free.
There are two forms of literature to which I should especially wish to acknowledge obligations. One of these consists of works in which we have authentic biographies of persons who have convinced many of their fellows that they were in receipt of divine communications; in particular I may mention the history of modern Spiritualism, by F. Podmore,[3] and the study on the founder of Mormonism, by I. W. Riley.[4] For the employment of "revelations"
- ↑ The Spirit of Islam, London, 1896, Calcutta, 1902.
- ↑ Bottom is probably touched by the New but True Life of the Carpenter, including a New Life of Mohammed, by Amos; Bristol, 1903.
- ↑ Modern Spiritualism, London, Macmillan, 1902.
- ↑ A Psychological Study of Joseph Smith, Jr., London, Heinemann, 1903.
