'lsl? were, the probable 1? 'of ?e ?, ? ? ? when ?e?; the ?ce of ?i? d?ay? ?ffi ?e ?ver? mon? shoed ? in ?i? ?, by w?h ? return ? Po? J?n wo?d be ?- ? preyed. To ?de? ?e ?nd w?d, ?m ? bei? we?y m?, subj? us ? ?ger ?m the M?ay pi?i? p? in ?ss? �e Stmi?; but, ? ? laaer m?e of p?- i? ?dd ? r?on? .W in ?e event ? o? f?iling ? ?e ?er, our ? op?on ?, ?t, of ?e two plus, ?e ?er w? m ? m ?or. U?n ?is d?ision ? ? were ?- m?a?ly set to work m ? o? empty wa?r- ?sks ? ?t ?r, ?d m get ? ?e wei?y ?gs off ?e d? into ?e ?ld, in o?er tb ?ve �e v?sd mo? s?bi?ty. ?s ? ?mp? ?. by night, ?d, a bre? ? day, we le? ?e ? cho?e wi? a ?sh b? ?m E.S.? ?nsideri? ?e ?on ?e we were on ?o?, it wo?d ? ?e ?st p?ump6on for me ? say ?g resp? Sa?, when ? g? ? ? is ?r?dy ?fom ?e pub? ? Cap? ?k's voy? ?. Eve? cko?s? ? we ?d ?m?re ? it is s? ?, e? �a ?e w?en ap?r m have l?t. ?e d? ?cy he d?s ?em m ?; ?or ?em were ?ver?, wh? ?ity ?d ?e ?vdty ? �Hi?swosws, ?. ?. ?. p ?, et ?.
�
