In fact, sclence conceived as resting on mere sense-perception, with no other source of observation, is bankrupt, so far as concerns its claim to self-sufficiency.
Science can find no individual enjoyment in Nature; science can find so aim in Nature; science can find no creativity in Natute; it finds mere rules of succession. These negations are true of natural science. They are inherent in its methodology. The reason for this blindness of physical science lies in the fact that such science only deals with half the evidence provided by human experience. It divides the seamless coat — or, to change the metaphor into a happier form, it examines the coat, which is superficial, and neglects the body, which is fundamental.
The disastrous separation of body and tind which has been fixed on European thought by Descartes is responsible for this blindness of science. In one sense the ab-
