Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/105

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
86
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina


The use of harsh words was not confined to one side. The opponents of nullification were accused of being "Submission men," ready to yield any and everything to the central government; their party was tauntingly referred to as the Submission party, and the members of it as "cowards," "recreants," "tories," "Yankee party of Charleston," "federalists," and "luke-warm politicians." They were said to be "Clay men," and that was about the worst thing that could be said of a South Carolinian.[1] Some editors there were who were more magnanimous, and, though they themselves took more or less of a partisan view, credited both sides with honest motives.[2]

For a time the Nullifiers claimed to have President Jackson on their side in this discussion; but after the Jefferson celebration in Washington in the spring of 1830, when he gave the toast: "The federal Union — it must be preserved," both factions boasted of his support. The interpretations of this toast varied greatly, with the result that even late in the year there was much uncertainty as to just where he stood. To this

  1. Courier, August 25, September 17, October 9, 1830; Mountaineer, September 24; Patriot, July 27; Journal, August 7.
  2. Mountaineer, July 16, 1830; Messenger, July 21.