Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/301

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
282
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

The absorbing interest of everybody seemed to be the support of one or the other of the two parties; small boys in the streets and ministers in the pulpits wore cockades showing their affiliations.[1]

In several districts of the interior Union men predominated in the militia companies and prevented them from being counted among the resources of the Nullifiers.[2] The Union party, too, was making an attempt at military organization. Their work had of necessity to be more secret. Joel R. Poinsett seemed to be known to be the leader of the Union forces, and some Union companies were formed, but not so many as among the majority party.[3] Though some of the Union men were so apprehensive that they sent their valuables to the North lest the Nullifiers confiscate them, the Nullifiers were also disquieted because in some few districts the Union military organization took on a formidable character.[4]

  1. Journal, February 2, 1833; Mountaineer, February 23.
  2. Mountaineer, February 16, 23, 1833.
  3. Poinsett Papers: Lee to Poinsett, January 2 1 , 1833 ; other letters in January and February.
  4. Niles' Register, February 9, 1833; Messenger, February 2. In a speech by Wilson, of Charleston, in the oonvention in March, referred to below, Horry, Chester, Greenville, Spartanburg, and Charleston were especially mentioned as districts where the Union organization was very strong.