Page:Philosophical Review Volume 3.djvu/272

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

NOTES.

The second annual meeting of the American Psychological Association was held at Columbia College, New York, on Dec. 27 and 28, 1893. The programme was as follows: (1) The Psychological Standpoint, Professor G. S. Fullerton; (2) The Case of John Bunyan, Professor J. Royce; (3) Auditory and Visual Memory, Professor W. M. Bryan;(4) Experiments on Visual Memory, Mr. H. C. Warren; (5) The Confusion of Content and Function in the Analysis of Ideas, Professor D. S. Miller; (6) Do we ever dream of Tasting? Professor J. C. Murray; (7) An Early Anticipation of Mr. Fiske's Doctrine as to the Meaning of Infancy, Professor N. M. Butler; (8) Address of the President, Professor G. T. Ladd ; (9) Accurate Work in Psychology, Dr. E. W. Scripture; (10) The Problem of Psychological Measurement, Mr. G. H. Mead; (11) The Perception of Magnitude and Distance, Dr. J. H. Hyslop; (12) Pain and Pleasure, Mr. H. R. Marshall; (13) Pain Contrasts, Professor E. Pace; (14) Presentation of Informal Papers. E. B. T.

It has been stated in recent issues of more than one periodical that the American Journal of Psychology is to be superseded by the Psychological Review. This statement is erroneous; the two journals will be published independently of one another. We regret, in a previous Note, to have unduly restricted the scope of the latter. The Psychological Review will seek to cover the whole field of Psychology.

Our readers will have noticed that for more than a year each issue of the Review (excepting No. 11) has contained 128 pages instead of 112, as originally intended. In this way the Review has been able to publish the extremely valuable series of papers on Kant Bibliography without seriously encroaching upon the space usually devoted to articles of more general and immediate interest. In view of the continuation of the Bibliography, the editors beg to state that if it shall seem necessary, they are prepared to enlarge the Review still further in order to include all articles and discussions of real merit.