The first break in this theory was also made by Professor Bigelow in the cloud work of the international year, when it was shown that the distribution of warm and cold masses in the anticyclone was not symmetrical but asymmetrical. In the symmetrical theory the center of motion coincides with the center of heat or center of cold; in the asymmetrical theory the center of motion is located near the edge of the warm and cold masses. The actual cyclone is warm on the one side and cold on the other side of the center, and likewise the anticyclone is cold on one side of it and warm on the other side of it. The northerly cold current, therefore, has a cyclonic center on the east side of it and an anticyclonic center on the west side of it, while the southerly warm current has an anticyclonic center on the east side of it and a cyclonic center on the west side of it. These differences are also fundamental. Ferrel treated the equation of motion by one solution, quite similar to that which he applied to the general circulation of the hemisphere, and he found the vortical torque for the cyclone clockwise on the outer part, anticlockwise on the inner part, with complex lines of flow connecting them. The theoretical difficulties are quite obvious when we consider that such a vortex as Ferrel worked out is applicable only to a fixed mass of air; for example, put a mass of water in a cylindrical vessel and sprinkle sawdust in it so that the stream lines can be followed by the eye. If now heat is applied to the center it will boil along the stream lines indicated by Ferrel's vortex, and especially so if the glass vessel is rotating on its axis. This would make our cyclones storms in which the same mass of air is boiling over and over again along these fixed lines, whereas we have shown that the cyclonic circulation is simply built up by currents of air which are streaming through it in a very irregular way, and, anticipating the conclusion which we have reached in our research, it may be asserted that the cyclone, besides being asymmetrical, conforms only loosely to any known type of theoretical vortex. The German school of meteorologists also discussed the symmetrical vortex, but by another mathematical process. There are two other solutions of the second equation of motion, one of which was assumed to apply to the outer part and the other to the inner part of a cyclone. The solution for the outer part has no vertical current, while the circulation for the inner has a vertical current, quite like that in the vortical helix, such as may be illustrated by the ordinary tornado tube. Many attempts were made to join the outer part and inner part in a single set of equations, the results conforming very loosely to the observed facts in nature regarding the velocity and angular directions. It is not too much to say that neither of these systems of solution will find more than a very small application in practical meteorology. Ferrel discussed the three equations of motion, one by one, giving certain practical inferences which he found more
