Page:Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Vol 2.djvu/46

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
14


On the Laws which regulate the Polarization of Light by Reflection from transparent Bodies.By David Brewster, LL.D. F.R.S. Edin.and F.S.A. Edin.In a Letter addressed to the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. K.B. P.R.S.Read March 16, 1815.[Phil. Trans. 1815, p. 125.]

Though Huygens, who first explained the laws that regulate the extraordinary refraction of light at a surface of Iceland spar, discovered that light thus separated has properties different from common light; and though Newton observed that light thus modified has permanent properties, with reference to the plane in which it has been refracted, and expressed this peculiarity by saying that these rays have sides according to which its subsequent refractions are regulated ;—it was Malus who gave to this modification the name of polarization, a term by which he could conveniently express the various affections which such light undergoes by refraction or reflection in different directions; and could thereby most distinctly describe the various phenomena relating to his important discovery, that light may also by reflection acquire the same properties that are given by refraction through Iceland spar and other doubly refracting crystals.

Malus ascertained, that when light is incident on the surface of water at a certain angle, that portion of it which is reflected is completely polarized; and that when light is incident on the surface of other media, the angle at which complete polarization of the reflected portion takes place will be different, being greater when the reflecting substance has a higher refractive. But Malus did not succeed in detecting the rule by which the requisite angles of incidence for different bodies could be inferred from their refractive powers.

Dr. Brewster has been more successful in this inquiry; and the result of his observations now communicated is, that the angles of incidence at which the maximum of polarization is affected by all substances he has examined are such, that tangent of incidence is to radius as sine of incidence to sine of refraction ; or as he expresses it, tangent of incidence is equal to the index of refraction.

And since tangent is : radius :: sine : cosine, it is evident that the angle of refraction is then complement to the angle of incidence, or their sum is a right angle; and hence the reflected ray forms a right angle with the refracted ray.

At emergence also from a dense medium, the part reflected will be more or less polarized, and the maximum of polarization will be found as before, to occur when the angles of incidence and emergence are complementary to each other, or when the reflected portion makes a right angle with the refracted ray. Hence, in polarization by a plate of glass, of which the surfaces are parallel, if the incidence on the first surface be such as to polarize the reflected ray, the portion reflected from the second surface will be polarized at the same time, a fact which Malus had observed, but acknowledged himself unable to explain.

Dr. Brewster further observes, that it is according to the same