Page:Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, vol. 25.djvu/181

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
TYLOR—QUATERNARY GRAVELS.
87

is exposed at 45 feet above the Ordnance datum-line. I have found the Cyrena at about the same height at D; and this is the highest level at which the Cyrena is found either in the Thames valley or in the Humber or Somme.

Fig. 18 is a section exhibiting the excavation of the chalk and Thanet sands by the old River Thames. The chalk (a) reaches a height (fig. 18) of about 45 feet above the Ordnance datum-line; and the Thanet sands (b) have been partly denuded, so that only 15 feet, out of 60 feet seen in the Station ballast-pit at Erith, remain here. The gravel (c) reposes conformably on the top of the Thanet sands at G, the upper part of the section; but the gravel follows the denuded surface of the chalk, filling up the concavities. It contains much rearranged Thanet sand; and a large lump (a) is conspicuous in it. The 6-feet step in the chalk is well marked and sharply cut out by the action of the river flowing at right angles to the line G K.

Fig. 19 is a section in the same direction as fig. 18; but steps from

Fig. 19.—Section in Erith Pit. (Natural scale.)

1 to 2 feet deep, cut by water in the Thanet sands, are distinctly seen. The gravel is then deposited in the concavities formed by the water. Brick-earth, with veins of gravel (d), follows on for 15 feet, and the covering gravel (e) succeeds, sloping to the river at a gradient of 1 in 200 only. The Thanet sand is a somewhat incoherent mass; and the action of the water must have been very gentle to have formed such perfect steps. The deposition of gravel and brick-earth must have at once followed the denudation.

Fig. 20 is a section along part of the line G E. The chalk, with a basement-bed of Thanet sands and green-coated flints, is seen at (d), in situ. The Thanet sands, in fig. 20, were excavated by one of the side-streams which formerly flowed into the ancient Thames. The edges of the sand (b) are so sharply cut in this transverse section of a river-bed that it would be difficult to believe it was not an ar-