Page:Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, vol. 34.djvu/487

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
EUROPEAN MIOCENE AND PLIOCENE STRATA.
405

The only differences to be observed between these antlers and those figured and described by Prof. Gaudry are that in the latter the second tyne rises at a smaller angle to the beam, and the third is larger. These are probably due to varying age and possibly race.

Fig. 1.

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, volume 34, number 24, figure 1.png

Fig. 2.

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, volume 34, number 24, figure 2.png

Fig. 1. Antler of Cervus Matheroni, Gerv., Brit. Mus., one third nat. size.
Fig. 2. Antler of Cervus cusanus, Cr. & Job., Brit. Mus., one third nat. size.

The absence of the brow-tyne (see B, figs. 3–5) separates this type of antler from that of the division Axis and Rusa, with which it has been compared.

Size.—The head of the animal was about the size of that of a large Roe-deer, which it probably resembled in outer form.