Page:Quarterlyoforego10oreg 1.djvu/166

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
52
Lon L. Swift

CHAPTER V. Land Tenure in the Counties of Oregon.

The conditions of land tenure in Oregon have been outlined for the States as a whole and the State has been compared to other geographical divisions. Let us turn our attention to the different counties and sections of the State itself. The figures showing in what counties the percentage of each of the different classes of farmers was the highest in 1900 will tend to explain the kinds of farming in which each was principally engaged.

TABLE 9.

PERCENTAGE OF THE NUMBER OF FARMS OPERATED BY THE DIFFERENT CLASSES OF FARMERS IN OREGON IN 1900, CLASSIFIED BY COUNTIES. ([1])

Counties. Owners. Part Owners. Owners & Tenants. Managers. Cash Tenants Share Tenants.
Harney 84.8 06.3 .... 4.0 2.0 2.9
Curry 83.4 02.4 .... 2.8 9.0 2.4
Tillamook 82.9 09.7 0.1 0.8 4.3 2.2
Columbia 82.8 06.2 .... 1.1 6.6 3.3
Malheur 80.1 06.7 .... 4.3 2.4 6.5
Wallowa 79.5 06.7 1.0 0.6 3.4 8.8
Grant 79.2 08.5 1.1 2.0 3.2 6.0
Wasco 77.8 87.6 1.7 4.4 8.5
Lincoln 77.5 11.0 1.4 0.2 6.8 3.1
Joesphine 77.2 07.7 0.7 0.9 5.2 8.3
Wheeler 76.7 14.3 0.8 0.8 3.3 4.1
Baker 76.1 03.7 01.7 3.6 5.1 9.8
Clatsop 73.9 04.6 00.2 2.8 15.0 3.5
Morrow 73.4 15.2 01.2 1.0 1.2 8.0
Lake 73.3 08.3 01.3 5.3 6.3 5.5
Union 72.9 08.5 01.0 1.0 4.6 12.0
Lane 71.6 10.1 01.1 0.8 6.0 10.4
Klamath 70.2 12.1 01.8 1.5 5.1 9.3
Coos 70.0 07.9 00.8 0.7 16.9 3.7
Washington 69.2 09.8 01.1 0.7 10.7 8.5
Clackamas 69.0 11.8 01.2 0.5 10.0 6.5
Crook 68.8 16.8 ... 2.4 5.6 6.4
Douglas 68.2 08.2 66.7 0.9 12.1 9.9
Umatilla 66.4 14.3 01.1 2.4 4.0 11.8
Jackson 65.7 10.0 01.5 1.7 12.0 9.1
Marion 62.0 13.8 00.4 2.1 5.0 16.7
Benton 61.5 17.8 01.6 0.2 6.5 12.4
Yamhill 60.2 15.5 01.6 0.9 5.7 16.1
Linn 59.2 13.1 01.4 0.7 4.5 21.1
Gilliam 58.5 31.3 .... 0.7 2.9 6.6
Multnomah 58.3 06.8 00.3 0.7 28.5 4.4
Polk 54.2 15.0 01.5 0.9 3.5 24.9
Sherman 50.6 32.1 00.6 0.4 0.9 15.4

  1. U. S. Census Reports for 1900, Twelfth Census, Vol. V, pp. 116-117.