Page:R v Stein (2024, NSWSC).pdf/2

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.


R v Arthurell (Supreme Court of New South Wales, 3 October 1997, unrep)

R v Garforth (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 23 May 1994, unrep)

R v Harris (2000) 50 NSWLR 409; [2000] NSWCCA 469

R v Holdom [2018] NSWSC 1677

R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374

R v Merritt (2004) 59 NSWLR 557; [2004] NSWCCA 19

R v Mostyn (2004) 145 A Crim R 304; [2004] NSWCCA 97

R v Twala (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 4 November 1994, unrep)

Rogerson v R; McNamara v R (2021) 290 A Crim R 239; [2021] NSWCCA 160

The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54

Cateogory: Sentence
Parties: Rex (Crown)

Justin Laurens Stein (Offender)

Representation: Counsel:

K McKay SC and N Marney (Crown)

C Davenport SC and T Kent (Offender)

Solicitors:

Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)

Katsoolis + Co. Solicitors & Attorneys (Offender)

File Number(s): 2022/15443
Publication Restriction: None. Note that the senior next of kin has given consent to the publication of the name of Charlise Mutten, pursuant to s 15E of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW).

JUDGMENT

1 HER HONOUR: There were two pieces of evidence given during the trial of the offender, Justin Stein, that say a great deal about the crime for which he is to be sentenced, that being murder contrary to s 18(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and about the offender, as the individual who committed the murder.