excited activity on the walls of the containing vessel. The air sucked up from the earth was even more active than that observed in caves and cellars. There can thus be little doubt that the abnormal activity observed in caves and cellars is due to a radio-active emanation, present in the earth, which gradually diffuses to the surface and collects in places where the air is not disturbed.
Results similar to those obtained by Elster and Geitel for the air removed from the earth at Wolfenbüttel were also obtained later by Ebert and Ewers[1] at Munich. They found a strongly active emanation in the soil, and, in addition, examined the variation with time of the activity due to the emanation in a sealed vessel. After the introduction of the active air into the testing vessel, the activity was observed to increase for several hours, and then to decay, according to an exponential law, with the time, falling to half value in about 3·2 days. This rate of decay is more rapid than that observed for the radium emanation, which decays to half value in a little less than four days. The increase of activity with time is probably due to the production of excited activity on the walls of the vessel by the emanation. In this respect it is analogous to the increase of activity observed when the radium emanation is introduced into a closed vessel. No definite experiments were made by Ebert and Ewers on the rate of decay of this excited activity. In one experiment the active emanation, after standing in the vessel for 140 hours, was removed by sucking ordinary air of small activity through the apparatus. The activity rapidly fell to about half value, and this was followed by a very slow decrease of the activity with time. This result indicates that about half the rate of discharge observed was due to the radiation from the emanation and the other half to the excited activity produced by it.
The apparatus employed by Ebert and Ewers in these experiments was very similar to that employed by Elster and Geitel, shown in Fig. 103. Ebert and Ewers observed that, when the wire net attached to the electroscope was charged negatively, the rate of discharge observed was always greater than when it was charged positively. The differences observed between the two rates of discharge varied between 10 and 20 per cent. A similar effect
- ↑ Ebert and Ewers, Phys. Zeit. 4, p. 162, 1902.
