In later experiments, Ebert[1] found that the radio-active emanation could be removed from the air by condensation in liquid air. This property of the emanation was independently discovered by Ebert before he was aware of the results of Rutherford and Soddy on the condensation of the emanations of radium and thorium. To increase the amount of radio-active emanation in a given volume of air, a quantity of the active air, obtained by sucking the air from the soil, was condensed by a liquid air machine. The air was then allowed partially to evaporate, but the process was stopped before the point of volatilization of the emanation was reached. This process was repeated with another quantity of air and the residues added together. Proceeding in this way, he was able to concentrate the emanation in a small volume of air. On allowing the air to evaporate, the ionization of the air in the testing vessel increased rapidly for a time and then slowly diminished. Ebert states that the maximum for the emanation which had been liquefied for some time was reached earlier than for fresh air. The rate of decay of activity of the emanation was not altered by keeping it at the temperature of liquid air for some time. In this respect it behaves like the emanations of radium and thorium.
J. J. Thomson[2] found that air bubbled through Cambridge tap water showed much greater conductivity than ordinary air. The air was drawn through the water by means of a water pump into a large gasometer, when the ionization current was tested with a sensitive electrometer. When a rod charged negatively was introduced into this conducting air it became active. After an exposure for a period of 15 to 30 minutes in the conducting gas, the rod, when introduced into a second testing vessel, increased the saturation current in the vessel to about five times the normal amount. Very little effect was produced when the rod was uncharged or charged positively for the same time. The activity of the rod decayed with the time, falling to half value in about 40 minutes. The amount of activity produced on a wire under constant conditions was independent of the material of the wire. The rays from the rod were readily absorbed in a few centimetres of air.
These effects were, at first, thought to be due to the action of
