Page:Republic of Sudan v. Rick Harrison.pdf/29

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Cite as: 587 U. S. ___ (2019)
9

Thomas, J., dissenting

at the diplomatic residence—which is afforded the same level of protection as the mission premises under Article 30(1)—does not violate the VCDR).

*** Because the method of service employed by respondents here complied with the FSIA, I would affirm the judgment of the Second Circuit.