Page:Reyes Mata v. Lynch.pdf/12

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
154
REYES MATA v. LYNCH

Thomas, J., dissenting

pears to be a categorical rule demanding that Mata's motion be construed (or recharacterized) as a request for sua sponte reopening. Because the majority does more than this by reversing the judgment below, I respectfully dissent.