Jump to content

Page:Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) (2023, FCA).pdf/14

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Person 11 [1240]
Person 35 [1284]
Person 32 [1292]
Matters advanced by the Applicant [1364]
Section 5 — Chinartu [1371]
Introduction [1371]
Events during the Mission [1382]
Does the OPSUM falsely record the timing and circumstances of the second EKIA of the Mission to Chinartu? [1430]
Was Person 12 present on the Mission to Chinartu? [1448]
Was the Afghan Male executed as described by Person 14? [1512]
Conclusions [1536]
Section 6 — Syahchow 18–20 October 2012 [1539]
Section 7 — Fasil 5 November 2012 [1544]
Introduction [1544]
Person 16's Evidence [1548]
Other Evidence which the Respondents content is Relevant [1597]
The Records Produced by the Department of Defence [1603]
The Applicant's Evidence [1612]
Person 11 [1634]
The Applicant's Challenges to Person 16's Evidence [1637]
The Respondents' Submissions [1669]
Findings and Conclusions [1681]
Section 8 — The Bullying or Person 1 [1693]
Pre-deployment Training for Rotation 3 [1705]
The Mission to the Chora Pass [1709]
Events after the Mission at the Base [1743]
Reports of the Engagement [1755]
Person 1's Performance after the Mission and his Contact with the Applicant [1760]

Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555
4