CATCHWORDS
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for review – whether application frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance – whether has no reasonable prospects of success – whether an abuse of process – interaction at Perth Airport – dispute with McDonald's Australia Limited – no reviewable decision – abuse of process – applications dismissed – prohibited from making subsequent application without leave
LEGISLATION
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) (repealed), s 42B
Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth), ss 12, 13, 101(1), 101(2)
Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (QLD)
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 474.17
Customs Act 1901 (Cth), pt XII, ss 243AB(3), 243X, 269SHA, 273GA
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), s 57A
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 134, 166(1)(b), 172(4), 306, 311F, 347(1), 474, 500
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), s 96(1)
State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), s 47
CASES
Frigger v Parkyn [2021] FCA 224
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2;(2003) 211 CLR 476
Re Ellis and Director-General of the Department of Transport [2011] WASAT 142
Re Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA); Ex parte Gates [2018] WASC 213
Re Walthen and Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] AATA 223; (2008) 71 ATR 342
Page 2 of 12
