chance of doing something to modify his misery. I never read his item to see whether there was anything wrong about it, but hastily wrote the few lines which preceded it, and sent it to the printers. And what has my kindness done for me? It has done nothing but bring down upon me a storm of abuse and ornamental blasphemy.
Now I will read that item myself, and see if there is any foundation for all this fuss. And if there is, the author of it shall hear from me.
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
I have read it, and I am bound to admit that it seems a little mixed at a first glance. However, I will peruse it once more.
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
I have read it again, and it does really seem a good deal more mixed than ever.
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
I have read it over five times, but if I can get at the meaning of it, I wish I may get my just deserts. It won't bear analysis. There are things about it which I cannot understand at all. It don't say whatever became of William Schuyler. It just says enough about him to get one interested in his career, and then drops him. Who is William Schuyler, anyhow, and what part of South Park did he live in, and if he started down town at six o'clock, did he ever get there, and if he did, did anything happen to him? Is he the individual that met with the 'distressing accident?" Considering the elaborate cir-
