those that had fought in the Valley. Lawton's regiments were comparatively strong. Stafford's were not; but if we put them at the average of Hill's regiments on July 20th, or about 350, we shall certainly be over rather than under the mark. Hence Jackson had, exclusive of Hill, possibly 12,000 infantry and artillery. Robertson's cavalry, after its hard service, could hardly have exceeded 1,000 or 1,200 men. Thus the Confederate force under Jackson on August 9 was—
Hill's division... | 10,623 |
Winder's and Ewell's division's... | 12,000 |
Cavalry... | 1,200 |
23,823 |
Nearly 24,000 men.
Of this force two brigades, Lawton's and Gregg's, were not on the battlefield. This diminished Jackson's strength by eleven regiments or about 3,800 men. So his force engaged against Banks was, by the above, about 20,000 men. But this is no doubt an excessive estimate, for in it no account is taken of the diminution which must have taken place between the latter part of July and August 9th, due to the heat and sickness of the season. In the ten days preceding the battle, Banks' Federal corps seems to have lost twenty-five per cent. of its strength from this cause. Jackson's strength was lessened, but not to the same degree. Jackson's losses in the battle itself were 1,314.
There seems to be an unnecessary tangle about the strength of Pope's army at the time of Cedar Run, August 9.
General Pope reports officially as follows:
Infantry. | Artillery. | Cavalry. | Total. | ||
First corps (Seigel's)... | 10,550 | 948 | 1,730 | 13,228 | |
Second corps (Banks')... | 13,343 | 1,224 | 4,104 | 18,671 | |
Third corps (McDowell's)... | 17,604 | 971 | 2,904 | 21,479 | |
41,497 | 3,143 | 8,738 | 53,378 | ||
Deduct infantry brigade stationed at Winchester... | 2,500 | ||||
Deduct regiment and battery at Front Royal... | 1,000 | ||||
Deduct cavalry unfit for service... | 3,000 | ||||
6,500 | |||||
Total... | 47,878 |
Note—"Instead of 14,500 infantry and artillery, Banks had only about 8,000, from his report to me after the battle of Cedar Mountain." The date of this return was July 31, 1862.