prisoner can take up consistently with his pledge of non-violence. Non co-operation when its limitations are not* recognised, becomes a licence instead of being a duty and therefore becomes a crime. The dividing line between right and wrong is often so thin as to become indistinguishable. But it is a line that is breakable and unmistakable.
What is then the difference between those who find themselves in jails for being in the right and those who are there for being in the wrong ? Both wear often the same dress, eat the same food and are subject outwardly to the same discipline. But whilst the latter submit to discipline most unwillingly and would commit a breach of it secretly, and even openly if they could, the former will willingly and to the best of their ability conform to the jail dsciplme and prove worthier and more serviceable to their causa than when they are outside. We have observed that the most distinguished among the prisoners are of greater service inside the jails than outside. 'The coelticient of service is raised to the extent of the strictness with which jail discipline is observed.
Let it be remembered that we are not seeking to destroy jails as such. I fear that we shall have to maintain jails even under Swaraj, It will go hard with us, if we let the real criminals understand that they will be set free or be very much better treated when Swaraj is established. Even in reformatories by which I would like to replace every jail under Swaraj^isciphne will be exacted. Therefore we really retard the advent of Swaraj if we encourage indiscipline. Indeed the swift programme of Swaraj has been conceived on the supposition that we being a cultured people are capable
�� �
