| 977.[1] | 977.[2] | |
| 962 | Wulfgar cl. | Æthelwold cl. |
| 962 | Brihstan cl. | Ælfstan cl. |
| 966 | Leofwine cl. | Wulfnoth cl. |
| 962 | Cynestan cl. | Wulfric cl. |
| 966 | Wynstan cl. | Cynetheng cl. |
| 962 | Eadwine cl. | Wulfhun cl. |
| 957 | Ælfstan cl. | Eadgar pr. |
| Ælfnoth cl. | Wulfgar cl. | |
| Æthelwold cl. | Leofstan di. | |
| 957 | Wulfnoth cl. | Tuna cl. |
| Æthelric cl. | Cynstan cl. | |
| Wunstan cl. |
Looking at the former of the lists for 977, we may note that three or four members of the body have passed away since 969, and on the other hand there are eight new names. Wynsige, who has come from Ramsey, is now at the head, and among the other new names some may be of those whom he brought with him from the Ramsey choir. Wulfric, who was at the head, now takes the second place. There are six survivors of the thirteen who attested Bishop Coenwald's charter of 957; twelve survivors of the seventeen who signed in 962. Thus it is plain that there has been no violent breach of continuity. On the other hand, we observe the effect of Oswald's reforming influence in the change from the two priests and one deacon of 962 to eight priests and five deacons in 977.
There are six charters of 977 which present this same type of attestation (K. C. D. 596, 612, 613, 614, 616, 617): but there is one of the same year (K. C. D. 615) which is unique, and, if we may trust it, most instructive.[3] Of its 27 names 10 have the title monachus affixed to them. In the next year and henceforward the usual type of attestation is found again, and Wulfric and Wistan, the two presbyters missing from the exceptional list, reappear in their usual places. We might perhaps suppose that they had abstained from signing as a protest against this unexampled method of attestation. A few of the later charters show the title monachus attached to an individual name here and there: but never again is the whole body divided into those who were monks and those who were not. If we care to imagine that hard words passed on this occasion, it will only throw into relief the fact that apart from this there is no evidence
