State of Arkansas vs. Little Rock, Mississippi River and Texas R'y Co.
days after its passage, was inadvertently made and escaped the attention of the court when the opinion was delivered, and must be considered as qualified to conform lo this opinion.
Mr. Cooley, Const. Lim., page 117, remarks that it is not always essential that, to be a complete statute, it must take effect as a law at the time it leaves the hands of the legislative department; but its taking effect may depend upon a subsequent event.
It is true that the time when the statute is to take effect may be made to depend upon subsequent events; but the necessary events in this case, to give force to the statute, must necessarily be precedent to the time of holding the election, not subsequent to it. At the time, therefore, that the law took effect, no vote had been taken at the ballot box, and, consequently, no power to legislate upon the subject of loaning the credit of the State.
In addition to this ground of objection to the validity of the act granting State aid, it is urged as an additional ground that the act of 21st July, 1868, was not read three times on three several days, in the two houses of the Legislature, as required by the provisions of the Constitution, and that for this reason, also, the bonds are void.
Art. V, section 21, Constitution, declares that every bill and joint resolution shall be read three times, on different days, in each house, before the final passage thereof, unless two-thirds of the house, where the same is pending, shall dispense with the rules.
It appears from House Journal, 1868, p. 480, July 20, on motion of Mr. Benjamin, substitute for Senate bill No. 49, an "Act to aid in the construction of railroads," was read first time.
Same day, on motion of Mr. Johnson, the rules were suspended and the bill read second time.
