brought the son in contact with the ablest men of the age. He was Secretary of the American minister to Russia at the age of fourteen. He early became acquainted with
Franklin and Jefferson, men who had a powerful influence
on his youthful mind. For three years he was a student
with Judge Parsons, a very remarkable man. These
years, from 1767 to 1794, form a period marked by
intense mental activity in America and in Europe. The
greatest subjects which claim human attention, the laws
that lie at the foundation of society, the State, the church, and the family, were discussed as never before. Mr. Adams drew in liberty and religion from his mother's
breast. His cradle rocked with the Revolution. When
eight years old, from a hill-top hard by his house he saw
the smoke of Charlestown, burning at the command of the
oppressor. The lullaby of his childhood was the roar of
cannon at Lexington and Bunker Hill. He was born in
the gathering of the storm, of a family that felt the blast, but never bent thereto; he grew up in its tumult. Circumstances like these make their mark on the character.
His attention was early turned to the most important matters. In 1793, he wrote several papers in the " Centinel," at Boston, on neutral rights, advising the American government to remain neutral in the quarrel between France, our ally, and others; the papers attracted the attention of Washington, who appointed the author Minister to Holland. He remained abroad in various diplomatic services in that country, in Russia and England, till 1801, when he was recalled by his father, and returned home. It was an important circumstance, that he was abroad during that time when the nation divided into two great parties. He was not called on to take sides with either; he had a vantage ground whence he could overlook both, approve their good and shun their evil. The effect of this is abundantly evident in all his life. He was not dyed in the wool by either political party,—the moral sense of the man drowned in the process of becoming a federalist or a democrat.
In 1802, he was elected to the Senate of Massachusetts, yet not wholly by the votes of one party. In 1803, he was chosen to the Senate of the United States. In the Massachusetts Legislature he was not a strict party man;
