form an agreeable duty." But there was found one
disciple who could "perform a disagreeable duty." He
went, perhaps "with alacrity," and betrayed his Saviour
to the marshal of the district of Jerusalem, who was called a centurion. Had he no affection for Jesus ? No doubt; but he could conquer his prejudices, while Mary and John could not.
Judas Iscariot has rather a bad name in the Christian world : he is called " the son of perdition," in the New Testament, and his conduct is reckoned a "transgression;" nay, it is said the devil " entered into him," to cause this hideous sin. But all this it seems was a mistake ; certainly, if we are to believe our "republican" lawyers and statesmen, Iscariot only fulfilled his "constitutional obligations." It was only "on that point," of betraying his Saviour, that the constitutional law required him to have anything to do with Jesus. He took his " thirty pieces of silver"—about fifteen dollars; a Yankee is to do it for ten, having fewer prejudices to conquer — it was his legal fee, for value received. True, the Christians thought it was "the wages of iniquity," and even the Pharisees—who commonly made the commandment of God of none effect by their traditions—dared not defile the temple with this "price of blood;" but it was honest money. It wasas honest a fee as any American commissioner or deputy will ever get for a similar service. How mistaken we are! Judas Iscariot is not a traitor ; he was a great patriot; he conquered his "prejudices," performed "a disagreeable duty" as an office of "high morals and high principle;" he kept the "law" and the "Constitution," and did all he could to "save the Union;" nay, he was a saint, "not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles." "The law of God never commands us to disobey the law of man." Sancte Iscariote ora pro nobis.
It is a little strange to hear this talk in Boston, and hear the doctrine of passive obedience to a law which sets Christianity at defiance, taught here in the face of the Adamses, and Hancock, and Washington! It is amazing to hear this talk, respecting such a law, amongst merchants. Do they keep the usury laws? I never heard of but one money-lender who kept them,[1] and he has been a
- ↑ The late Mr. John Parker.
