CORRIGENDA, BTC, TO VOL. I. 317 p. 889 ; in margin, /or " 1392/' read '< 1395," and far " 1477/' read " 1478 "; line 8, for •• before 1876," read •' Feb. 1869/70 "; line 6, for *• May," read " 29 May "; line 8, /or «*V read "coheir"; /or *< by Margaret, his wife," read *<and sole heir to her mother hie second wife, Margaret, da. and h. of John db Cltvbdon. Shei. 14 Sep. 1389 '*; line P,/or ** 1392. His widow < 4 Sep. at some date before 1458," read "1895"; line 11, /or "1889," read "20 Feb. 1389/90"; line 18, a/Ur'*m., aid "firstly"; line 14, for <*He d. B.p.iiL (1462) 2 Ed. IV," read "or of John (Biaumont), Lord Bbadmort. He m. secondly, before 1458, Margaret (who, apparently, was younger than his da.) da. of Thomas (db Rob) Lord Rob, by Eleanor, da. of Richard (Bbauobamp), Earl op Warwick. He ^. s.p.m. 15 May 1462"; line 16, condude*^H% widow m. Thomas (BuROB or Borodoh) Ist Lord Buroh, who <f. 1496. Her inq. p.m. 4 Hen. VII "; line 18, for " 1477," read " 7 Feb. 1477/8 "; line 26, far *< in her right," read " doubtless, tho* such marriage"; line 22, for "1507," read "1506." Note (•}, deU, and intert " See Vol. iii, p. 186, note (^), tub Hastings." P* 890 ; line 2, after " JSTatiinf*" add " [1461] and Lord Habtirob dr HoROBRroRO [1482J "; line 8, /or " 1507," nad " 1506 "; line 10, after •« rf.," add " s.p."; line 29, (ieIs*'AND"; after *' Haetinfft^" add "and Baronrbb Habrrm dr Hurobr- roRD"; line 81, for "1886," read " 1868"; line 87, for "these four," read "the"; line 48, deU "and" ; Une 49, after "(1461)," mdd "and Habtirob db HUHORRPORD (1482)." p. 381 ; between tines 5 and 6, infert a line of asteritks. Note (*>, line 2, dele " Mutr." Note (<X line 6, after " Kirwan," add " and d. 80 March 1888, leaTmg issae." p .392 ; line 11, for "intending," read " intended "; Une 22, for » Bouohibb," read " BOURCBIBR." p. 383 ; line 6, /or ** He d, B.p. 1431," read "who d. s.p. in the autumn of 1480, being killedinaction, near Amiens"; line 10, /or "Earl," read "Count"; line 15, as also in note (•), Une 1, Jar "Earldom," reiKf " Oountehip "; line 17, for " IV," read " VI,'> and for " Boargehier;* read " JBomgehierr Note (f) deU, and inmH "See Vol. iu, p. 288, note (d), eub " Essex." p. 394 ; line 28, for " His," read "The Marquess d. 28 Oct. 1570, aged about 58, and, soon afterwards, his"; Une 24, dele *'The MarquesB d, soon afterwards, 28 Oct 1571 "; lines 27 and 80, deU " db Chartlbt,^' Note (^) oonelttde "The act of 1552 was repealed next year by Queen Mary. For 'the time of the Oomroon wealth ' should [writes H. Qough] be read ' the time of the Divorce act of 1 858, as diToroes by spec, aete of Pari, were, of coarse, in oontntTentaon of tho general law.' " p. 396 ; lines 4 and 7 and in note («>), Une 6, deU « de OharUey "; Una 18, /or " 36," reoil " 25 "; after last Une inMeri a$ helow^ [BOURKE or BURGH. Ulick Bourkb or Db Burgh, styled Visoount Tunbridgb, b. and h. ap. of Richard, 4th Earl of Clamrioardb [I. 1548], 1st Eabl op St. Albaitb [K. 1628 J, h, Dea 1604, was sum. Y.p. te the Honse of Lords, by write 7 March 1627/8 and 20 Jan. 1628/0 directed ' Ulick Burch [t.#., Burgh] Ch'lr, primogenito Ricardi, Comitis S. Albani,' such summons bein^ apparently in his father^ Barony of SomerhUl [1624], tho', according to the writs, it would seem to be in a Barony of Burgh. He eue, to his father's peerages in 1645. See GLaVRiOAaDB Earldom [I.], er, 1548, under the 5th Earl and 1st Marquess]. p. 396 ; line 6, for «<his," read "Sir William's"; Une 11, for "Theobold," read «' Theobald." Note («), Une 6, deU " also." p. 397 ; line 6,/or*'famUy,"rea(l'*family(«),"«"<'«UMiaufNo/« "(e) There is warrant of a grant, 19 Sep. 1608, by James I, of a pension of £50 to Theobald Boorke, ^arofi of CattU Oonnell"; Une 28, for " male " read '*male(<>)," and ineeri at taid note *'(<*) It seems probable that there was an intsrmediate Lord, named Ethelbert, who held the title for a short time [1668-60 f], for there existe a petition [Stete Papers of Ireland, Vol. 850] of ' Ethelbert^ Lord Baron of Brittatf' Matthew Plunket, son of Lord Louth, and others, which must be between 1668 and 1660, to am«ud their claims before the Court of Cliiiui« and to be restored, upon
