OORRiaENDA, ETC., TO VOL. IV. 483 p. 359 ; in mtrgin, far •* 1804," read «« 1802." Une 9, fir " 1788," r^ad •* 1778 "; ]ine 11, fir 1804, nged 71," read "1802, at Bath, aged 69"; line 18, after
- '1808," ddd '<at her house near Elleamere"; line 28, nfter «1816," add "at
Gredington." Note («), line 8, fir " Semerset," rtad "Somerset." Note (•), line 2, fir " 1801, aged 26," rtad " 1800, aged 25." p. 360; line 26, after <* unm.," o^ "at his aeat, Elveden Hall, Suffolk." p. 361 ; Note (^), line 8, fiyr " Countess," read *' wife of Lord Robert Dudley, after- wards Earl" Note {^), eondude " See also toI. viii in the oorrigenda to vol. !▼, p. 892." p. 364 ; Note («>). line 8, for " he," read " Thomas "; line 4, deU ** he." p. 365 ; line 21, for "1680," read "1680(^b);* and tniert a» Mid m>U "(t>b) The will, 1620 [tie], of ' Thomas, Lord Baron of Eierrj and Lyksnawe,' is in the index to the wills in the Prero^. Ct. [J.]"; line 27, for about 1680," reod shortly before 25 March 1627 "; line 29, tifler " Midx.," add *' Will, 1660, in Prerog. Ct. [I.] "; line 86. eondude " Will, 1697, in Prerog. Ct [I.]." p. 366 ; in mar^n, for " 1741," read " 1742." Line 6, for " 1741," read " 1741/2 "; eondude '•Will, 1742, in Prerog. Ct (L]"; line 17, after "63," add "Will, 1747, in Prerog. Ct [L]"; line 83, after "Court," add "Qreen"; lines 40 and 41, fir " 1722," read •• 1728." p. 367 ; line 48, after " Barony," add " [L]." p* 368 ; between lines 18 and 14 intert at imder-^ [As to the early owners of the Honour of Kildari, one of the ftre divisions made, in 1246, of the great Palatine Honour of Leinster, see vol. i, p. x.] last line, eondude " His widow living 1829-80." p. 369 ; lines 9 and 10, dde " Darct," to " 1840," intert " (Darot), Lord Darot di Knaith, who d, 80 May 1347" ; Hue 27, fir "before Deo.," read "between 20 March and 6 Nov. " ; line 89, after " He,^' add " in 1472 " ; for " Brothert read " KnighU." p. 370 ; last line, after " widow," ddd " m. as his first wife. Sir John Wallof, K.O. (who d, B.p. July 1561), and." p. 371 ; line 6> for "«i*.," read " tue.{^) " and intert at taidnote " (*; * A mysterioas bill, sanctioned by Hen. VIII. for passing in the Irish pari, of 1515, enacts ' that Qerald FitzQerald, nowe Deputie unto our Sov. Lorde the King, . . . have and enjoy the name, estate, stile, dignilie and preemynence of th' JSrle of Kildare ... to the said Gemld k to the heyre male of his body.' [App. to 9^^ Kep. Hitt MSS., p. 273.] This was the so cnllml 0th E.ir1, who in gnnerally considered to have sue. his father in due courae (1513). What then can have been the meaning of such an act f Is it poraible that the attainder of his Father in 1494 hffd never been formally reversed f This would seem to be a novel suggestion, but we find, on reference, tlist no such reversal is alleged in Lord Kildare's well known work, entitled ' The Ear It of KUdare,* where it is merely stated that ' the Earl was restored to his honours and estates ... by letters patent, 6 Aug. 1496.' IE this view be right, the declaratory Act of 1515 with its limitation to heirs male of the body, would be parallel to those passed in the cases of Stafford, Lumley, and Darcy.*] Round's Earldom of KUiare^ &a, in the Oenealogitt^ N.S., ix.] "; line 24, for " 1582," read " 1585." p. 372 ; line 15, for ** restored," read " re«tored(»»»>)," and intert at taid note " (bb) « n is a new creation with lim. to the heirs tnnle of the body of the grantee, but with clauses granting the same precedence in Pnrl. nud out of it as any of the Earl's predecessors had enjoyed. Now this brings it exactly into line with Queen Mary's other patents of the Earldom of Devon (1558) and Northumberland (1558).' [Round's Earldom of Kildare, as above]. See also vol. i, p. 229, note (*)"; line 19. /or " act," read " act(««) " and »«•«' at taid note " («) ' Now the Act of 1569 was not, as alleged, a revertal of the altnindtr, but only a rettoration in blood, despite the attainder. It seems to me therefore that this Act is of great interest in its bearing on restitution oE blood as affecting the descent of Peerage dignities. The cases with which it should be compared are Stafford (1 Ed. VI.), Lumley (1 Ed. VI.), and Darcy (2 Ed. VI). For [in] all these three esses, where the 2p
