OORRIQENDA, ETC., TO VOL. THL 523 VOLUMB VIII. p. 1 ; note (^), last line, for " oofeiure/' r$ad *' eorerture." p. 3 ; last line but one, /or ** in 12** [1254]," read " 14 Feb. 1268/4 "; Uai line, ftr " improduoUve/' read " unprodudtive." Note (•), line 6, fir *< 4, note c," reed " 6, note cL" p. 4 ; line 27, fir *'8 weeks later/' read " 4 weeks later, to him and hit hein "; lines 27 and 28, fir *< be was er.," read " the King recites that be has belted him "; line 32, fir " Emmeline or Leceline," read '* as a first wife [aocording to the suggestion(iC) of J. H. Round], Letotine (or Joseline), da. of Thomas Di Vbrdom {d. in Ireland 1199), and heiress of Ratoath and Nobber. He m, [secondir?] Emmeline"; ineeri a$ $aid noU "(n) See Round's article on the BaruuM nf the Naa$ in the Oenetdogitt, N.8., vol xv "; lines 86 and 37, dele " was " lo ** haTo," and ineeri ** by whom he had no surv. issue "; last line, conclude " by whom she had a da. and h. (see vol. iii, p. 868, line 28). She d. between 18 May 1276, and 20 Feb. 1276/6." Note (>>), line 3, after *' da.,*' add " whose existence is oerUin, VIM, Matilda, wife of David FitaWilliam (FitzMaurice FitaGerald), Baron of the Naas"; fir "is," read "is sometimes"; line 4, fir "but very problematical," read " erroneously suggested "; line 6, after " and," add " even." p. 5 ; in margin, for " 1266," read '* eirea 1267." Line 7, dele « Edward the Black "; after " Prince," add *< Edward "; lines 9 and 10, dele ** probably " to '< 1266X" and iuhttUuie "at some date after June 1266 (being apparently first so styled in 1269), became." Note (»), line 4, for " possibly was," read *'tho' often snggestcd to be"; line 6, dde, and evhetUute "was a totally distinct person." [Round's Feudal Bn^nd, p. 517]." p. 6 ; Hue 2,ybr " of Lanvalay, or Lanville," read " by Hawys, da. and h. of William DB Lavtallii." p. 7 ; iMt line but one, aftir " H.," add " Prince." p. 8 ; line 31, for " 14 Jan. 1681," read " 18 Jan. 1680/1." p. 9 ; Une 1, after " 1681," add " pr. 1682, at Prerog. Ot [I.] "; line 19, eonelude " Will, 1682, in Prerog. Ct [I.]." p. 10 ; line 14, after " 1696," add " Will, 1698, in Prerog. a. [I.]." p. 12 ; Hne 6, conclude " (b)," and (naert ae eaid note " (b) An able paper on The Familff of De UrUaeo has been contributed by the Re?. E. H. Bates to toI. xlii of the Proceedings of the Somerset Archoological and Natural History Society (1896). From this it appears that Henry de Urtiaoo, summoned 1299, was nrobably (as indeed the dates sumst) the son, not of Henir (d 1242) and Satrina, but of their son, Richard. Further, the name of his wife was Sibilla, and the date of his death, 10 Sep. 1821. Inq. p. m., 6 Oct. 1321. His son and suooeesor was not Henry, as in the text [of vol. ▼, p. 144], but John, who died 1340, leaving only a dau., Sybil, who married John de Middleney (her first cousin), by whom she had a son and heir, John. The writ of 1826 cannot be positiTelv accounted for, being either (as in some other cases) issued in ignorance of the death of the Baron who was sum. in 1299, or, if accnrate, intended for his nephew^ Henry de UrUaoo, who was soUt 26 in 1806.' [J. H. Round]." p. 13 ; in maif^, for ** with," read " having." p. 15 ; line 86, for " 1816," read " 1816." Note (•), Ihie 6, dele " ftc" p. 18 ; line 21, for " 27 Hen.," read " 17 Hen."; lines 26 and 26, for " Pari. 28 April (1681), 28," read "the Pari, held 16 [not 6 as hi Dugdale] Jan. (1688/4), 26." p. 19 ; line 12, nftcr " by," add " his cccond wife."
