Page:The Economic Journal Volume 1.djvu/279

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE PROBABLE EFFECTS OF AN EIGHT HOURS DAY
257

Act, which makes it compulsory on mine-owners to supply returns relating to the output and the number of persons employed, was not then in force. The great increase shown in the number of persons employed in the year 1872 is ascribed by the Inspectors of Mines partly to the more accurate returns received.[1]

In Northumberland, North Durham, and Cumberland the days and hours of working were reduced from five days of six hours to four and three-quarter days of six hours;[2] in South Durham from four and a half days of eight hours to four and a half days of six hours;[3] in the Midlands from sixty to forty-eight hours per week;[4] and in South Staffordshire from four and a half days of eleven hours to four and a half days of eight hours.[5]

In Yorkshire, South Wales, and North Staffordshire no change occurred, but in the majority of districts either the average number of days worked per week, or the average number of hours worked per day, was reduced, with the result that a maximum eight hours day was universal over the whole country. One cause of this reduction of hours was undoubtedly the limitations placed on the employment of boys by the Coal Mines Regulation Act. That Act practically established a maximum week of fifty-four hours for hewers. 'A man,' says Mr, Hewlett, 'has his drawer with him, the person who hauls the coal from where it is cut to the nearest mechanical appliance, and they refuse to work without these drawers, and consequently, by limiting the hours of labour of the boys, the hours of labour of the men have diminished.'[6] It was calculated that in Northumberland and Durham the Act had shortened the hours of hewers by one hour in the fortnight.[7] Apart, however, from any effects of the Act, the high wages prevailing during 1872 led to a very general reduction in the average number of hours worked per week by the hewers. Why was this? The answer lies in the fact that the hewer, like every other member of the community, aims at a certain 'standard of comfort,' and when that is realized he prefers to take subsequent improvements in his economic position in the form of greater leisure. Eight hours is the maximum day at which the miner aims, and when the conditions of industry enable him in that time to earn his standard wages, he prefers to reduce his hours rather than increase his wages.

We have now to consider the effect of the reduction of hours

  1. Q. 688.
  2. Q.1228–1230.
  3. Q. 1390.
  4. Q. 901.
  5. Q. 2449, 2452.
  6. Q. 1984.
  7. Q. 3037–3041.