Tycho's observations of the planet Mars. Yet, as M. Bertrand remarks,[1] it was well for Kepler that his material was not too accurate or its variations (due to the then unmeasured force of attraction) might have hindered him from proving his laws; and luckily for him the earth's orbit is so nearly circular that in calculating the orbit of Mars to prove its elliptical form, he could base his work on the earth's orbit as a circle without vitiating his results for Mars.[2] That a planet's orbit is an ellipse and not the perfect circle was of course a triumph for the new science over the scholastics and Aristotelians. But they had yet to learn what held the planets in their courses.
From Kepler's student days under Mæstlin when as the subject of his disputation he upheld the Copernican theory, to his death in 1630, he was a staunch supporter of the new teaching.[3] In his Epitome Astronomiæ Copernicanæ (1616) he answered objections to it at length.[4] He took infinite pains to convert his friends to the new system. It was in vain that Tycho on his deathbed had urged Kepler to carry on their work not on the Copernican but on the Tychonic scheme.[5]
Kepler had reasoned out according to physics the laws by which the planets moved.[6] In Italy at this same time Galileo with his optic tube (invented 1609) was demonstrating that Venus had phases even as Copernicus had declared, that Jupiter had satellites, and that the moon was scarred and roughened—ocular proof that the old system with its heavenly perfection in number (7 planets) and in appearance must be cast aside. Within a year after Galileo's death Newton was born[7] (January 4, 1643). His demonstration of the universal application of the law of gravitation (1687) was perhaps the climax in the devel-
- ↑ Bertrand: p. 870-1.
- ↑ The two laws first appeared in 1609 in his Physica Coelestis tradita commentarius de motu stellæ martis. (Frisch: VIII, 964.) The third he enunciated in his Harmonia Mundi, 1619. (Ibid: VIII, 1013-1017.)
- ↑ "Cor et animam meam": Kepler's expression in regard to the Copernician theory. Ibid: VIII, 957.
- ↑ Ibid: VIII, 838.
- ↑ Ibid: VIII, 742.
- ↑ Kepler: Op. Om.; I, 106: Præfatio ad Lectorem.
- ↑ Berry: 210.
37
