Adversaria. 95 VI. 32. Epictet. Enchir. Paraphr. Christian, c. 38 (Schweigh. Vol. V. p. 66) : Ilpoo'evxop.evot, /lit) 7repl xpr)p,a.Ta>v tj tSv aXXcov to>v Kt6s alrcofxeda' fiaWov to 6ei]fia avrov alroofieBa iravrore, on kcu npoyivaxTKei d>v Xprj^ofxev kcu Krjderai 7rdvrcov. VI. 34. ThllC. II. 3D 5 I TlepiyiyveTai rj/xiv rots re ixeXXovcriv aXyeivols p.rj 7rpoKap.veiv. Epictet. I. 9 19: "Orav xP Ta(r ^V Te o~r)p.epov, Kadrjade kXAovtcs nepl rrjs avpiov, Tr66ev (pdyrjre. I have retained this passage, though Raphel, Wetstein, and Wolf have quoted it on verse 25. VII. 2. Diodor. Fragm. Vat. p. 66, Mai: AUaiov yap ia-nv ov Kaff iripoiv tis vop.ov Wt]K Tovra KexpTJcrdai. VII. 12. Cleobul. ap. Orell. Opusc. Moral. I. p. 150: *0 o-v /xicrfiy, erepa> fir) Troirjcrys. VII. 13. Orell. Opusc. Moral. I. p. 59 : Littera Pythagorae discrimine secta bicorni, HumanaB vitae speciem prasferre videtur. Nam via virtutis dextrum petit ardua collem, Difficilemque aditum primum spectantibus offert, Sed requiem praebet fessis in vertice sum mo. Molle iter ostendit via lata, sed ultima meta Praecipitat captos, volvitque per ardua saxa. Cf. ib. p. 480. VII. 16. Sen. Ep. 87 21 ( 25 Haase) : Non nascitur igitur ex malo bonum, non magis quam ficus ex olea : ad semen nata respondent; bona degenerare non possunt. X. 22. Plin. Ep. x. 97 2 : Nee mediocriter haesitavi, . . . no- men ipsum etiamsi fiagitiis careat, an flagitia cohaerentia nomini puniantur. Cf. Tertull. Apol. n. 21, Arnob. n. 1, Justin. Apol. i. 4, Athenag. 2. X. 26. Phaedr. Fab. Nov. xxn. 1 : Nil est occultum quod non manifestabitur. One passage, amongst many, which betrays the late origin of these new fables*. X. 31. Porson reads ttoXXw. Aristophan. p. 110 (ad Acharn. 270.) J. E. B. Mayor.
- The occurrence of the story of the of Salisbury, whom the author of the
Ephesian matron in Phsedr. Fab. Nov. article Petronius in Ersch and Gruber's 13, does not prove that the writer was Encyclopadie (in the supplementary no- acquainted with Petronius's more gra- tice at the end of the volume), cites as phic version (c. in, 112) ; for that story the second authority for the tale. He seems to have been early popular in might have learnt from the notes on Kome, and both writers may have used Petronius that it occurs in Eomulus's it independently. The fabulist, be he prose edition of Phfedrus. who he may, probably lived before John
