Reviews. 1 23 clause. Aristophanes has MoXottikos, iEschines MoXorrds. We have not succeeded in finding the word in intermediate writers. It seems a less violent remedy to restore the form MoXorria, attri- buting the other to the scribe, than to reject the word alto- gether. It has nothing suspicious in it except the form. Col. 36, 1. 22. 7rpo(rfjKev. Cobet and Patakis irpovr^eiv. The reading of the MS. is more vigorous. Col. 37, 1. 19. B. and S. bond. The MS. reading o>y ifu> 6WIs, should be retained. Col. 38, 1. 2. Palam est excidisse fj post Kplvetv. C. We seem to find traces of this intentional abruptness more than once in these orations of Hyperides. Col. 38, 1. 25. Kadeo-raKa. On account of the form of this word, C. suspects kg eh dyava KaOeaTam to be " additamentum Graeculi." The form is not entirely indefensible (see Schneid. pp. xviii. 50), but it is here probably a substitution on the part of the scribe for KaTeo-rrjo-a. Traces of a kindred error are seen col. 47, 1. 4. The scribe has inadvertently treated Hyperides in the same manner in which Demosthenes has been used by Dionysius. See Dem. p. 117, cited by S. Col. 42, 1. 22, sqq. 6 icpipopevos f oij. S. proposes irorepos and av in his Addenda, but the MS. reading is evidently of, not to mention the increased awkwardness in this close juxtaposition of vpas and (Tv. Kayser and Cobet suppose a new clause to begin with kckcos, and the former attaches ml iroTcpov...(rv to the previous sentence. In their restorations of the mutilated passage following, they have evidently departed from the MS. Col. 42, 1. 25. If the letter before aioi in the MS is k, the reading may have been aXX' clo koL ot, " there are others besides, who, &c," meaning the judges. But, if the facsimile is trust- worthy, it is probably a /3, and the letters in the text will be -/3atot, or -fiiaioi, for there seems to be room for an t after the . Mr B. now suggests aXX' ol fidppapoi. Spengel also proposed pdp- fiapoi. The sense however seems to us to require ol dvo-Tvxovvres, " the oppressed." Mr Shilleto is probably right in reading the following words ravra y "[owi /ca]XXr^, on. Col. 42, 1. 26. Perhaps read 6Yt ov[re 7r6is e]o-Tiv ovb[ep.ia] iv rfj oUovpevrj, Or as Mr B. now proposes, on oldev SXo io-riv ovbapov. Col. 43, 1. 27. Spengel's restoration of the passage appears
