Most certainly, he said, if our idea of the State is ever carried out.[1]
In the next place our youth must be temperate?
Certainly.
Are not the chief elements of temperance, speaking generally, obedience to commanders and self-control in sensual pleasures?
True.
Then we shall approve such language as that of Diomede in Homer,
“Friend sit still and obey my word,”[2]
and the verses which follow,
“The Greeks marched breathing prowess,”[3]
“…in silent awe of their leaders.”[4]
and other sentiments of the same kind.
We shall.
What of this line,
“O heavy with wine, who hast the eyes of a dog and the heart of a stag,”[5]
and of the words which follow? Would you say that these, or any similar impertinences which private individuals are supposed to address to their rulers, whether in verse or prose, are well or ill spoken?
They are ill spoken.
They may very possibly afford some amusement, but they do not conduce to temperance. And therefore they are likely to do harm to our young men—you would agree with me there?
Yes.
And then, again, to make the wisest of men say that nothing in his opinion is more glorious than
“When the tables are full of bread and meat, and the cup-bearer carries round wine which he draws from the bowl and pours into the cups;[6]
