be pardoned if he thinks—one would hope in no spirit of exaltation—also of the differences.
We have an instructive analogy in connexion with the learned societies.
It is uncontrovertible that every candidate for election into such a society will have, and will feel that he has, affinities with the members of that association. And he is invited to set these forth in his application. But there may also be differences of which he is not sensible. On that question the electors are the judges; and they are the final court of appeal.
There would seem to be here a moral which the feminist would do well to lay to heart. There is also another lesson which she might very profitably consider. A quite small difference will often constitute as effective a bar to a useful and congenial co-operation as a more fundamental difference.
In the case of a body of intellectual workers one might at first sight suppose that so small a distinction as that of belonging to a different
