Jump to content

Page:The United States and the establishment of the republic of Brazil.pdf/12

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

between a republic and one of the best of monarchies, tended to hasten recognition of the new order in Brazil. Another consideration which urged this policy was a desire to secure and retain the friendship and the markets of the largest and most populous Hispanic American state. Consequently, as soon as news of the revolution reached Washington the minister of the United States in Brazil was instructed to maintain diplomatic relations with the provisional gov-
ernment. Moreover, a few days later he was directed to give the republic “a cordial and formal recognition” as soon as the majority of the people of Brazil signified their ac-
ceptance of the new regime.[1]

The proposed delay in formal recognition was deemed by the administration a wise precaution in view of the fact that such a step, if taken before the real nature of the revolt had become manifest, might succeed only in strength-
ening a military despotism whereas its true design would be to advance the cause of popular government in the New World. Yet President Harrison’s announcement of his policy to Congress occasioned a somewhat vigorous attempt on the part of aggressive members of the democratic party to force the executive to move more rapidly. They argued that immediate recognition would strengthen the hands of the republicans of Brazil and do much toward discouraging any designs of interference which might be entertained in Europe. The friends of the administration in Congress were able to delay precipitate action, however.[2]

With reference to this policy public opinion was divided, but apparently the majority was in accord with the admin-
istration; and although decided partisan coloring may be detected in the press, both parties made it clear that they had the true interests of the Brazilian people at heart. A few quotations will set forth the various motives and cross currents which were operating at the time.

—7—

  1. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (1889), pp. 61-63.
  2. For the discussions and procedure of Congress, see Congressional Record, 51 Cong., 1 sess., pp. 216, 313ff., 323, 871, passim.