Page:The Vampire.djvu/163

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE GENERATION OF THE VAMPIRE
137
  • 11  Chronicles of the House of Borgia, Baron Corvo, p. 283.
  • 12  S. John, ix, 22, seq.
  • 13  S. John, xii, 42.
  • 14  S. John, xvi, 2; and S. Luke, vi, 22.
  • 15  S. Matthew, xviii, 16–18.
  • 16  Theodore Balsamon, I, 27 and 569; apud Migne.
  • 17  Jacques Goar, “Ἐυχολόγιον siue Rituale Graecorum,” Paris, 1667, p. 685.
  • 18  C. xiii.
  • 19  Balsamon, I, 64–5 and 437.
  • 20  Cambridge, 1619.
  • 21  Op. cit., xv.
  • 22  Under Justinian, Theodore Askidas and Domitian of Caesarea refused to condemn Origen. It remains an open question whether Origen and Origenism were ever anathematized. Authorities are divided, and modern writers hesitate to pronounce. The balance of opinion seems to be that Origen was not condemned, at least it does not appear that Popes Vigilius, Pelagius I, Pelgaius II, S. Gregory the Great, recognized any such condemnation.
  • 23  Reigned 535–36.
  • 24  Dialogues, Book II, c. xxiii.
  • 25  The Holy Rule; especially cs. vi–vii.
  • 26  This subject was painted by Lucio Massari, a pupil of Ludovico Caracci, in the cloisters of the Benedictine convent of San Michele-in-Bosco, Bologna. Unfortunately the fresco has perished, but it is to some extent known from engravings.
  • 27  De Sancta Uirginitate, xlv.
  • 28  Dialogues, Book II, c. xxiv.
  • 29  Born 339 or 340; died between 394 and 403.
  • 30  The Council of Constantinople held in 692 under Justinian II, commonly called the Council in Trullo. The Orthodox Church reckons this Council to be oecumenical, but this was not so recognized in the West. S. Bede (De sexta mundi aetate) even terms it a reprobate synod; and Paul the Deacon (Hist. Lang., VI, p. 11) an erratic assembly.

Also the third Council of Carthage.

  • 31  The cult of S. Othmar began to spread almost immediately after his death.
  • 32  Iso of S. Gall wrote De miraculis S. Othmari, libri duo, which is given by Migni Patres Latini, cxxi, 779–796, and in the Monumenta Germaniae Historiae Scriptorum, II, 47–54.
  • 33  The Historia Translationis Sancti Cuthberti as printed by the Bollandists and by Stevenson (Eng. Hist. Soc., 1838) is superseded by the fuller text in the Rolls Series and in the Surtees Society, LI, London, 1868.
  • 34  IV, xli.
  • 35  1585–1644.
  • 36  This also appears in the edition of the Works of S. Gregory of 1705. Muratori (De rebus liturgicis, vi) highly praises the Commentary of Dom Ménard.
  • 37  He died 1058. See Will, Aeta et Scripta quae de controuersiis ecclesiae graecae et latinae saeculo XI composita extant, Leipsig, 1861; and Adrian Fortescue, The Orthodox Eastern Church, London, 1907.
  • 38  Or τὸ περατίκι. Schmidt, Das Volksleben der Neugriechen suggests that in the local dialect it may be περατίκιν.
  • 39  Protodikos, Περὶ τῆς παρ᾿ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, 1860, says that in certain districts of Asia Minor the custom was still connected with Charos; and in the same year Skordeles, Πανδώρα, xi, p. 449, stated that “until a short time ago” the coin for Charos was placed in the mouth of the dead at Stenimachos in Thrace.
Such a practice even prevailed in England, and in some country places was observed far later than might be supposed. I have been shown by a friend a silver coin of the reign of Queen Anne which was placed in the mouth of his