It is well known that the Hun descent of the Magyars and Székelys has equally been questioned. Savants of such authority as Budenz and Hunfalvy disclaim the Him relationship, and endeavour to prove the Finn-Ugrian origin of the Magyars. Whereas Professor Vambery, in his work on the "Origin of the Magyars," which received so favourable a reception at the hands of the whole learned world, defends, as we saw above, a Turco-Tartar descent.
It lies far beyond the limits of this work to give even a brief outline of the history of the Székelys: yet a few data may not be out of place to show that, although they are at the present time, and mayhap always have been, a Magyar-speaking people, yet they are in many respects distinct from the race known as the Magyars. Ibn Dasta, an Arab writer,[1] at the end of the ninth century, informs us that in his time some Bulgarians lived on the banks of the River Itil (Volga); and that they con sisted of three tribes, viz.: the Berzuls, the Esseghels, and the Uz. He further says that "the first territory of the Magyars lies between the country of the Bisseni and the Esseghel Bulgarians."
Another Arab writer, Ibn Muhalhal, about the middle of the tenth century, mentions a people named "Jikil," who lived next to the "Bajnak." If the writers who would identify in this Ashkal, Esseghel, or Jikil people, the parents of the Székely race, be right in their conclusions, then the Siculi (as they are called in Latin deeds) are of Bulgarian descent.[2] But we know
- ↑ Abu-Ali Achmed ben Omar ibn Dastás. Information regarding the Kozars, Burtas, Bulgarians. Magyars, Slavs and Russ. Edited by D. A. Chvolson, S. Petersburg, 1869 (in Russian); quoted by Hunfalvy in his Ethnography of Hungary.
- ↑ Abn Dolif Misaris ben Mohalhal De Intinere Asiatico Studio Kurd de Schloezer. Berolini, 1845. Cf. Defrémery Fragments de Geographes, &c. in Journ. Asiat. ser. iv. torn. xiii. 4G6. Both quoted by Colonel Yule in Cathay and the Way Thither. London, 1866. Vol. i. pp. cxi. and clxxxvii.
