inductions from definite conditions, and may be called the laws of population. They are, too, both historical and predictive. One cannot only ascertain through them the past condition of States and peoples, but they give a light which opens up with clearness the future of great commonwealths.
But, singular as it may seem, there is no fixed law of history by which to determine the probabilities of the race-problem in the United States. We can find nowhere such invariability of result as to set a principle or determine what may be called an historical axiom.
Observe just here the inevitable confusion which is sure to follow the aim after historical precedent in this problem.
The descendants of Nimrod and Assur, people of two different stocks, settled in Babylon; and the result was amalgamation.[1]
The Jews and the Egyptians under the Pharaohs inhabited the same country 400 years; but antagonism was the result and expulsion the final issue.
The Tartars overran China in the tenth century, and the result has been amalgamation.
The Goths and Vandals poured into Italy like a flood, and the result has been absorption.
The Celts and Scandinavians clustered like bees from the fourth to the sixth centuries in the British Isles, and the result has been absorption.
The Northmen and Gauls have lived side by side in Normandy since the tenth century, and the result has been absorption.
The Moors and Spaniards came into the closest contact in
- ↑ "Duties of Higher toward Lower Races." Canon Rawlinson, Princeton Review, Nov., 1878.
